Sander Zwier.deb

My feedback

  1. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Ideas Portal » Item Authoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sander Zwier.deb supported this idea  · 
    Sander Zwier.deb commented  · 

    Hi Jim, it would be nice to be able to exempt the last, or the last 2 options from randomization, to account for the scenario you indicate (all & none of the above).

    Our current system (Questionmark) supports this, though I admit it appears a bit kludgy.

    Thanks for your suggestion regarding using Multiple Response. That would be nice for tests that are taken on screen, but I doubt if that question type is supported in our print workflow.

    Sander Zwier.deb shared this idea  · 
  2. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Gathering Votes  ·  0 comments  ·  Ideas Portal » Item Authoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sander Zwier.deb supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base